markets...personified

Breaking News

Goldman execs get big 2009 fund payouts
8:01 PM  03/19/10

Stocks eye health reform, housing, Greece
7:19 PM  03/19/10

Dow's eight-day win streak comes to an end Fr...
3:09 PM  03/19/10

Fed must identify banks that needed bailout f...
12:31 PM  03/19/10

FIFA Joins The Billion Dollar Club
8:26 PM  03/19/10

Where The Jobs Are: Accounting
7:50 PM  03/19/10

Your Money: Have Extra Cash to Cut Mortgage? ...
4:10 PM  03/19/10

Dow’s Winning Streak Ends at 8
4:00 PM  03/19/10

more »

Regulating Dealers Could Make Things More Risky

By David Enke | June 26, 2009 | 9:18 AM | 0 Comments

In an interview with the WSJ, Gary Gensler, Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, said he believes the most critical change needed in the oversight of derivatives is the regulation of dealers involved in derivatives (see article). He goes on to say that "only through the dealer can we get the whole panoply" of information regarding derivative contracts. Such a move would require customized contracts traded over-the-counter (OTC) to go through a central repository, similar to an exchange clearing house.

Gensler believes that "central clearing will further lower risk," but will it? While this is probably true initially, the long-run benefits could disappear. How so? Given that dealers will need to abide by stricter capital and margin requirements, the capital requirements will no doubt continue to grow as the added liquidity risk of less actively traded contracts is accounted for. While again this seems sensible, the extra cost will force even more contracts to move on to the exchanges. This will in turn reduce the amount of OTC contracts that are likely to be offered. Once again, all good, right? Not necessarily. One of the benefits of OTC contracts is that you can develop a specialized contract that better matches the risk you are trying to hedge.

Standardized contracts do not offer the same flexibility, causing a company to enter into less than perfect hedges, thereby making the company more risky over the long-run. This has the effect of causing risk management to be more expensive and less efficient for companies, just at the time when additional risk management is being encouraged.

Once again, raising capital requirements on risky assets has some obvious benefits, but hopefully the added burden is not so much as to eliminate the efficient use of the OTC market. If this happens, regulators may find themselves dealing with yet another problem. In the mean time, I guess at least the exchanges (NYX, NDAQ, CME) will be happy as the potential for increased order flow continues to rise.

Comments (0)  |  Related Topics  »

Post new comment

Please solve the math problem above and type in the result. e.g. for 1+1, type 2
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options
 

FREE NEWSLETTERS

Trader's Talk

WEEKLY FLOW

MOST POPULAR

24-Hour |  48-Hour |  7-Day