Depression in 2009?

By Clif Droke | November 28, 2008 | 9:44 PM | 3 Comments

After suffering through the biggest stock market correction since the 1930s, many are wondering if the market - that great discounting mechanism - foresees depression in 2009. The thinking behind this interpretation of the 45% correction is that the stock market envisions a collapse in GDP and the biggest downturn in consumer spending of the current generation.  Could the bear market of 2008 in fact be warning us of economic gloom next year?  Is the U.S. destined to start the path, in the words of one widely followed observer, to becoming a Third World country in 2009? 

Interpreting the Recent Volatility in Gold

By Bill Luby | November 26, 2008 | 12:11 PM | 0 Comments

I have been receiving quite a few questions about gold and gold volatility lately, so with gold receiving a lot of attention in the press, I thought this would be a good time to check in on the commodity and on the CBOE's gold volatility index (GVZ), which was launched back in August.

A Strategy for Obtaining Energy Sector Exposure

By Jim Farrish | November 25, 2008 | 9:07 AM | 2 Comments

OPEC continues to attempt damage control with meetings to reduce production on crude oil. The last move was to cut production by more than 2 million barrels per day. There is another meeting planned to cut production again. I am of the opinion oil is trading relative to the economic data and market outlook currently. This means the supply/demand card that had been driving oil is now focused on what is happening in the U.S. and global economies. If the outlook improves the price of crude rises and if it deteriorates it declines. This is a psychological shift in the thinking among traders and analyst. Therefore, as an investor I have to play the market based on what analysis or strategy works during the current trend.

 

 

 

Outlook - The energy sector has been in a significant downtrend since July. The 50% decline has cleared the decks of speculation to the upside, but has now swung the other way to the downside. The current base being constructed is either a stopping point and we are going to reverse back to the upside or it is consolidating prior to continuing the downtrend. The statistical odds favor the downside continuation, but it is important to let the market decide that point versus speculating or guessing. This is an opportunity to put the sector on our watch list and play the short term movement or develop a longer term strategy should it play out. I would expect oil to trade in the $45-60 per barrel range near term and that should keep the sector in a trading range as well. Take what it gives and play with discipline the short term moves until the next trend develops.

Trend - The dominate trend is down. A simple look at the chart shows the move lower in July confirming the long term and short term trends to the downside. The five year uptrend line which started in 2003 was broken in May and the sector has continued lower since. The only question mark currently is the short term trendline. It would take a move above 500 on the index to take the trendline out. The six week consolidation we are currently in will give a clue on the trend when it breaks - up or down. For now we are consolidating short term to determine a trend break or a continuation of the downtrend. The longer term downtrend line would take a significant move to the upside to break.

Strategy - A close below 357 would be a continuation of the downtrend and a opportunity to be short the sector. A move above the 435 opens a buying opportunity short term. Anything longer term would need to gain momentum to the upside or accelerate to the downside. The simple fact is we are at a decision point. I like what is taking place in the sector technically. The longer the consolidation period the more people who will see it, write about and anticipate the move. That makes the breakout stronger and the play more predictable. Fundamentally the sector is better off with lower oil prices near term to ease some of the cost structure built into the higher price of crude. This ‘timeout' allows the companies to make better deals for the future and the refiners to start making money again. Look for the breakout of the trading range short term and play based on a strategy that fits your risk tolerance. (NYSE: IYE) (iShares S&P 500 Energy ETF) is the ETF for the long side of this play and (AMEX: DUG) (ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas ETF) is the short side of the play. Remember the two times leverage on DUG and adjust your play accordingly. Stay disciplined with any play short term. Define your entry, exit and target.

Revenge of the Barbarous Relic

By Kurt Kasun | November 20, 2008 | 11:57 AM | 17 Comments

Marc Faber’s latest report written on November 1 was titled “Why Market Interventions by Governments worsen Economic and Financial Conditions!” I might have called it "Vengeance of the Barbarous Relic". John Maynard Keynes granted gold with this pejorative, giving license to governments to intervene, print, and distort to their heart's content. In the long run we are all dead...right? Wrong! The long run is now and the chickens are coming home to roost.

Gold: Is There a Valid Bearish Argument?

By Steve Saville | November 18, 2008 | 11:59 AM | 0 Comments

Anyone who thinks that changes in the fabrication-related (jewellery, etc.) demand for gold are important determinants of the gold price is looking at the gold market as if total supply were roughly the same as annual mine supply (annual fabrication demand is equivalent to a large percentage of annual mine supply). However, the supply coming from mines adds less than 2% per year to the total aboveground gold supply. In other words, those who focus on fabrication demand and mine supply are, in effect, basing their analyses on less than 2% of the gold market. The other 98% of the market is clearly where the focus should be, and that 98% is governed by changes in investment demand.

In the short-term, prices are moved by factors such as sentiment changes and margin calls; and these factors are often unpredictable. For example, there is no way of knowing the financial situations of the large speculators that dominate the trading of COMEX gold futures, and, consequently, no way of quantifying the risk that these speculators will be forced sellers of gold in the near-term. It is therefore possible that an extension of the de-leveraging trend will push the gold price to new lows for the year over the coming days, although the Commitments of Traders data suggest that a lot of de-leveraging has already taken place and that a move to new lows would be short-lived.

When considering the outlook for the next 6 months or longer, the only gold-bearish argument that currently holds any water is the deflation-related one. If the forces of deflation overwhelmed the efforts of central banks such that the total supply of money began to contract, then gold would probably keep performing well in terms of most other commodities but would perform poorly in terms of the deflating currencies. As a result, we would not be intermediate-term bullish on gold if we thought that genuine deflation (a contraction in the money supply) was a likely outcome.

It could also be argued that even if the money supply continues to grow at a robust rate, the outward signs of inflation will become less evident over the year ahead and this will lead to weaker investment demand for gold. We view this argument as having less validity than the one related to monetary deflation, but not because we expect the prices of everyday items to remain in strong upward trends. On the contrary, we fully expect inflationary effects to become less pronounced over the coming year. In fact, this is a point we began making when inflation fears were at their highs during the second quarter of this year. Our point, then and now, is that the prices of everyday goods and services surged during 2006-2008 in response to the rapid money-supply growth that occurred during the first few years of the decade, but that the next phase will entail a substantial slowing in the general price level's rate of ascent in response to the relatively slow money-supply growth of 2005-2007. (Note: M3 did not reveal this important monetary trend change, but TMS did.)

Our expectation that the outward evidence of inflation will dissipate is supported by the performance of the Future Inflation Guide (FIG) calculated by the Economic Cycle Research Institute (ECRI). Despite its name, the FIG has nothing to do with monetary inflation; rather, it is a leading indicator of the prices of goods and services. Specifically, it is designed to indicate what will be happening to prices in 6-12 months time. As illustrated by the following chart, the FIG (the blue line) has plunged over the past few months.

The superficial signs of an inflation problem will almost certainly subside over the next 12 months, but this should not create a significant headwind for gold as long as the rate of monetary inflation continues to rise. As discussed in the past, the reason is that savvy speculators will likely accumulate positions in gold in anticipation of the eventual/inevitable effects of the monetary inflation.

We only have to go back to 2001 for a historical example of what we are referring to. Gold's long-term bull market began in April of 2001 -- a time when the FIG was at a multi-year low and in freefall.

 

This is an excerpt from a commentary originally posted at www.speculative-investor.com on November 13th, 2008. 

Regular financial market forecasts and analyses are provided at our website.

We aren’t offering a free trial subscription at this time, but free samples of our work (excerpts from our regular commentaries) can be viewed here.

 

Gold Reminder from Saville

By Chip Hanlon | November 13, 2008 | 2:20 PM | 2 Comments

Steve Saville penned another interesting piece for subscribers yesterday, and in it he made a point with which I agree:

The "Hard" in Merk's Currency Fund is a Misnomer

By Chip Hanlon | November 04, 2008 | 3:14 PM | 3 Comments

As with a lot of investments previously considered "safe" by investors this year, the Merk Hard Currency Fund (NSDQ: MERKX) has had a rough go of it of late. This fund, which is merely meant to represent a basket of foreign currencies other than the U.S. dollar, has reminded folks this year how aggressive the movements in foreign currencies can be (the fund is down 21% from its February's highs).

Commodities Bull Market?

By Scott Wright | October 31, 2008 | 1:05 PM | 0 Comments

The face of today's mainstream financial media has gone from meaningful analysis and commentary to constant tub-thumping between undisciplined Main Streeters, overambitious Wall Streeters, and ignorant bureaucrats.  It has turned into a showcase of the blame game, everyone looking for a scapegoat to shoulder the iniquities of the masses.

Though these recent financial-market shenanigans are of historic proportion and have scared stiff nearly every investor on the planet, folks seem to be growing complacent.  And it has been easy to fall into this trap and lose sight of investment strategy considering the indiscriminant selloff of virtually every asset class.  Everything has been hit so hard that even the anti-commodity CNBC commentators have toned down their bubble-bursting rhetoric.

But now more than ever investors need to step back and revisit their strategies.  The markets have changed, and for better or worse we need to know if what has worked in the past will continue to work going forward.  And what has worked in the past is commodities.

Hands down, commodities have been the top-performing asset class of the 21st century.  This powerful commodities bull was driven by strong global fundamentals that saw skyrocketing demand far outpace supply.  Based on simple economic principles this imbalance prompted commodities prices to launch stratospheric.

Regardless of the mainstream financial media's continual disdain for this commodities bull, which has run parallel with a secular bear for their precious stock markets, legendary gains were won for those prudent investors and speculators who saw the writing on the wall.

Now there is certainly a valid argument to be made that exuberant speculators caused many commodities prices to reach overbought territories and perhaps even launch into bubble-type parabolas.  But there is no denying that it was the fundamentals that provided a solid foundation for the run on commodities.

Well with the crumbling financial markets taking their toll on the global economy and launching what is expected to be a recession of historic proportions, is the commodities bull over?  Over the course of the last several years the financial media has proclaimed the end of the commodities bull on countless occasions.  And much to their chagrin they have been wrong every time.

But is it different this time?  Is the commodities bull really over?  In the past it has been easy to defend this bull market using anecdotal evidence of real-time hunger for scarce raw materials.  But this time there seems to be little defense for commodities.  And over the last several months there has been a massive selloff in the commodities realm.  Nothing has been immune to the carnage.

While the dust may not have fully settled yet, fundamental changes in the global marketplace are already beginning to unfold.  And I believe it is prudent to catch our breath and see if and how these interim fundamentals are changing the secular nature of the commodities bull.  But first we need to assess the damage.  To place the commodities bull in strategic context I put together a table that captures its essence.

 

 

Since there is no official date that marks the beginning of the commodities bull, as individual commodities began their bulls at different times, for reference sake I used a date that I believe marked the end of the secular stock bull.  March 24, 2000 was when the flagship S&P 500 (NSDQ: SPX) index reached its apex, and this is as good a point as any to mark the beginning of the commodities bull.

The first column shows the price of each component at the beginning of the commodities bull.  In the preceding 17 or so years that molded these starting values the flow of capital poured into the stock markets and left commodities with reckless abandon.  After years of a grueling bear that ravaged the commodities industry, many of these March 2000 prices neared historic lows.

But after years of neglect in which investment in commodities exploration and infrastructure all but dried up, suppliers would get a rude awakening when there was resurgence in demand.  The supply side of the commodities trade was unprepared for the rapid demand growth that was soon to come.

From these March 2000 lows, commodities prices would soar as suppliers scrambled to meet demand as well as take advantage of the new higher prices.  But unlike a widget factory that can increase supply with the turn of a dial, it is much more difficult to ramp up commodities production.

At the turn of the century much of the commodities supply chains consisted of aging and depleting resources within shoddy and rundown infrastructures.  A lot of work needed to be done in order to materially increase the capacity of natural resources production.  But especially for those resources that are finite, hidden in the bowels of the earth, fresh new operations would only come about after intense exploration, discovery, and development.  And this process is neither quick, easy, nor cheap!

Petroleum and mineral production offer fine examples of this tedious process.  The first phase involves establishing the economic feasibility of a mineral deposit or oilfield, which takes years of intense exploration.  If a project is actually revealed to be economically viable, only then do the directors of the producing company hammer out the details and make the decision to develop operations.

After a positive development decision the project owners must then procure financing for what are usually sizeable capital expenditures.  The development/construction phase then takes several more years, and if all goes well the project will eventually be ready for commercial production.  Ultimately it can take between 5 to 10 years and hundreds of millions of dollars just to commission a medium-size mining or drilling operation.

As a result of this slow response time on the supply side, supply growth was nowhere near meeting demand growth.  And when supply can't meet demand, the only thing capable of quelling demand is rising prices.  As you can see in the second column, prices responded with sharp ascents.

These bull highs returned the massive gains we see in the third column.  And keep in mind these gains are measured from a common point of reference.  Many of these commodities launched into their respective bulls from prices that were even lower than those in March 2000.

For example the HUI (AMEX: $HUI) gold-stock index didn't achieve its low of 35.99 until later in 2000, giving it a trough-to-peak gain of 1331%.  Many of the base metals didn't hit their lows until years later.  From trough to peak aluminum, copper, nickel, zinc, and lead had respective gains of 165%, 581%, 1124%, 537%, and 896%.  And oil's low of $10.73 was actually achieved in late 1998, giving it a trough-to-peak gain of 1259%.

Regardless of their exact lows, these bulls were secular in nature.  And as you can see in the fourth column most commodities achieved their interim tops at some point in 2008.  And with oil being the largest and most influential commodity, when its bull ran out of steam in summer 2008 so marked the top of the venerable CCI.

As you can see in the next two columns the recent global selloff of anything and everything has hit commodities hard.  Prices are vastly lower than their highs achieved not too long ago.  And these price declines are massive.  Many of these commodities have seen their prices lopped in half, or more, in short order.

Oil is off by a whopping 53% since its July high.  Measured by global consumption this translates into a staggering $6.5b swing to the downside in daily capital flows in just three short months.  Copper, which is the highest-profile base metal, is down 49% off its July high.  And the grains are also suffering, with corn and wheat off 41% and 61% from their 2008 highs.

So with this across-the-board slaughter does it mean that the commodities bull is over?  I don't think so!  And I know this stance is of extreme contrarian nature right now but hear me out.  The commodities bull is not over for one simple reason, and this is Asia.

I understand that many folks are getting tired of the constant beating of the Asian drums, but these drums have been loud for a reason.  And while the thumping sound may not be as audible in these chaotic markets, it is not going away.  Led by China, Asia's developing economies will continue to thrive for decades to come.

One way to look at Asia's growth prospects is through the eyes of its massive population.  Using China as an example, we know that its government is hell-bent on growing its economy to become the decisive world powerhouse.  And as part of this growth its people will prosper.

The 1.3b+ people in China and even the 2.7b+ people in the rest of Asia combine for a massive consumer base that has never been party to past commodities bulls or economic prosperity.  The Western economies, US and Europe, have long been the sole drivers of market cycles until now.

With an infrastructure build-out that is still in its early stages mixed with wealth and discretionary capital in the hands of folks that long to live the Western lifestyle, commodities consumption should continue to rise in the years to come.  Measured by per-capita commodities consumption the Westerners have been through a growth cycle that has likely seen its peak.  But in Asia per-capita commodities consumption is expected to rapidly rise as people improve their lifestyles.

And this per-capita commodities consumption growth should not be too affected by the stock market travails.  A lot of the funds pulling out of the Asian markets are sovereign and speculative, and were held by a limited number of hands with large positions.  I don't expect these losses will impact the average Asian citizen in the same way they will the average Westerner.

Now I'm not saying that we aren't experiencing a period of contraction on the commodities front, even in Asia.  A global recession will reach far and wide.  In fact we are likely in the midst of an extended cyclical bear on the commodities front.  But I don't believe this bearish cycle has the moxie to put an end to the secular bull.  And neither does China.

Just recently the Chinese government commented that while economic growth will slow a bit during this turmoil, the unfavorable international factors and even serious natural disasters at home won't change its core economic growth strategy.  China made it emphatically clear that its economic growth machine has the ability to repel whatever external risks are thrown at it.

And when you consider that China hosts well over 50% of the world's construction, that coal-fired power plants are going up at a rate of one per week, and that oil demand is expected to increase by 50% in the next 10 or so years, it is apparent that China has some clout in the global commodities markets.

But regardless of this China rhetoric, many still ask how I can possibly believe that this commodities bull is still alive in the face of such rapidly declining commodities prices.  For many folks "correction" is an understatement.  As you are likely aware analysts of all walks of faith are using "crash" with impunity.  And depending on whose definition you go by some commodities prices may have indeed experienced a crash from their tops.

Ultimately however you define the shellacking that commodities have endured, I don't believe this activity is bull-ending.  This extraordinary selling pressure is likely a combination of commodities prices perhaps getting too high for their own good mixed with extreme and unprecedented market fear.

Looking at the last column on this table we can see that even though commodities prices have seemingly fallen off a cliff, most are still way above their lows.  And I included the SPX in this table to offer some perspective.  If there is any challenge to the ironclad reality of the secular bear in the general stock markets and the secular bull in commodities this table ought to clear things up.

Investors who've had their money in the SPX since 2000 have had a tumultuous and unrewarding journey.  A brutal 2000 to 2002 cyclical bear that shed 49% was followed by an impressive 2003 to 2007 cyclical bull that doubled-down, bringing investors just back to par.  But when you throw inflation in the mix, flat performance after 7+ years is devastating to one's portfolio.

After the SPX peaked nearly a year ago, which was only 2% higher than its March 2000 high, it has spiraled down by 41%.  Investors in commodities over this 8-year span have fared much better.  As you can see even after the commodities carnage of late, the gains are excellent.

From March 2000 to current most commodities and the stocks involved in their trade are still sporting impressive gains.  The ride has certainly been wild, and traders have had to befriend volatility, but it has been very rewarding for those who got in early.

As for calling a bottom my inner contrarian tells me it is here now.  I believe commodities and commodities stocks are vastly oversold and represent incredible bargains.  But it is also prudent to consider how much farther the trepidation that is driving these markets mixed with a broken financial system can drag prices to the downside.

Right now we are going through a period where leveraged speculative positions are being unwound and the economic landscape is being rebalanced.  Commodities demand has definitely slowed, but it has not disappeared.  Unfortunately the financial media is currently using the careless phrase "demand destruction" far too loosely when describing the commodities markets.

In reality the only thing being destroyed is commodities prices.  Demand is not being destroyed.  My business partner Adam Hamilton has an alternate view of this demand-destruction paradox.  In the 10/21/08 issue of our Zeal Speculator weekly newsletter he wrote:

"...traders are acting as if a recession means demand Armageddon, but that is silly and irrational.  If a normal year is given a baseline of 100, a recession with 2% economic shrinkage still comes in at 98.  An unthinkable 5% annual decline in US GDP is 95% of the normal baseline year.  Oil demand will contract modestly in a recession, but not implode totally.  We Americans will still eagerly consume vast quantities of raw materials."

"Similarly, Chinese and Indian demand aren't going to fall off a cliff either.  Growth may slow, but demand will still be immense from an absolute perspective.  China just reported that its Q3 GDP came in at 9.0% growth, which hammered commodities.  Yet this wasn't down from 30%, just 10.6% in Q1 and 10.1% in Q2.  Chinese demand for oil and most key commodities is still growing rapidly..."

Adam goes on to explain that even in slow economic times there is still a lot of demand for raw materials.  Recessions don't wipe out demand, they are slight reductions in overall aggregate consumption levels.  It is fear and panic that is driving this massive commodities selloff.  And these price levels are unsustainable over the long run.

In fact, these depressed prices are likely to snowball into yet another severe supply pinch.  We are already seeing widespread production cuts not only in the oil industry but the mining industry.  Many operating mines cannot profitably produce their metals at today's prices, causing production stoppages.  And many development projects are being put on hold not only due to these low commodities prices but the dried-up credit markets and lack of investor interest in equity offerings.

Shifting gears, while weakness may persist for a spell as most commodities prices seek to stabilize and find their balances, especially the industrials, the precious metals should really thrive in today's environment.  In the table above you can see that gold has not given up its ghost, and has retained most of its gains.

This strength is a result of rock-solid and unchanging fundamentals.  Gold's commoditized nature is unique in that it acts as a safe haven and store of wealth.  And in these uncertain times when even cash is risky, gold offers investors true value.  The economic balance of gold is also unique compared to other commodities.  Gold mine production continues to fall in the face of rising demand.

These are just a handful of gold's stellar fundamentals.  And this global financial crisis should be a great boon to gold's desirability.  When these gargantuan government bailouts start to filter through the system the world will experience a huge inflationary period as the printing presses are stressed to their limits.  And this is where the demand for gold will really flourish as investors diversify out of the fiat mess.

Overall I believe the greater commodities bull market is not over.  Throughout history commodities bulls have run for an average of about 17 years, and I have no reason to believe this one will be any different.  As you can see in the table above commodities have been the strongest asset class over the last 8 years, and I believe they will continue to be the strongest for at least the next 8 years.

At Zeal we are students of the markets and constantly seek to better understand and trade them.  We've been performing cutting-edge market analysis and research since this commodities bull began in 2000 and have been using this knowledge to execute high-potential trades in our acclaimed Zeal Intelligence monthly newsletter.

We also put this research to work in the form of supplemental reports on a variety of sectors in the commodities realm.  Our most recent report profiles the most promising commodities ETFs and ETNs, which are all dirt-cheap today.  To purchase this report and/or join our many subscribers who seek guidance, experience, and fortitude in these wild markets, visit Zeal today!

The bottom line is it is fundamentals that ultimately drive the secular nature of any bull market.  And the long-term prospects for commodities remain very strong.  China will continue to be the stalwart of the world's developing countries, and it is these countries that have and will continue to drive this commodities bull.

The interim growth trends may recede for a while, but they will not grind to a halt.  And we may even find that the chain reactions caused by today's extreme fear will quickly pinch supply and cause an even sharper run on commodities as soon as this recession runs its course.  Investors who haven't given up on the commodities bull should again be in line for legendary gains.

Scott Wright

October 31, 2008

 

So how can you profit from this information?  We publish an acclaimed monthly newsletter, Zeal Intelligence, that details exactly what we are doing in terms of actual stock and options trading based on all the lessons we have learned in our market research as well as provides in-depth market analysis and commentary.  Please consider joining us each month at this link.

Thoughts, comments, or flames?  Fire away at scottq@zealllc.com.  Depending on the volume of feedback I may not have time to respond personally, but I will read all messages.  Thanks!

Copyright 2000 - 2008 Zeal Research (www.ZealLLC.com)

The Politics of Oil

By Brad Zigler | October 30, 2008 | 2:25 PM | 0 Comments

Oil traders are looking ahead to two upcoming events. On Friday, November heating oil and gasoline futures go off the boards. And Tuesday, of course, is Election Day. The outcome for Friday is a certainty; Tuesday, not so much. Last Trading Day forces the hands of oil traders who came into the day with better than 21,000 contracts open in the expiring product futures. Most of that will be settled by offset, so expect a pop today that'll likely add a third to the volume seen yesterday and will certainly add to volatility.

Confidence is the New Buzzword

By Jim Farrish | October 29, 2008 | 3:39 PM | 0 Comments

Plenty of talk today around the concept of confidence stepping up. That may be true, but I am not buying into the confidence measurement of the media. One big up day doesn't cancel all the negative sentiment and skepticism we have experienced over the last eight weeks. Crude prices rise on... confidence. Yen rises on rumored rate cuts in Japan sparking... confidence. Libor rates fall below 3.5% on... confidence. Fed rate cuts inspire... confidence.