We were recently asked by a client, "If you see signs of a possible new bull market, why are we still sitting on so much cash?" It can be answered by using a fence analogy. We have been taking some smaller positions while maintaining a relatively high cash position in order to play both sides of the fence:

The Far Side Of The Fence: If stocks move lower,

The Near Side Of The Fence: If stocks continue to move higher,

Our approach takes into account that markets have historically demonstrated they can do anything at anytime, especially in the short-run. Markets do not always follow a pattern or take the path associated with the higher probability outcome (breakouts can fail). We should always be thinking in dual probabilities - what happens if we are right?.....what happens if we are wrong? In recent weeks, the questions we asked ourselves were, "What happens if the breakouts are successful and the markets move rapidly higher to fill gaps in the charts?" and, "What happens if the breakouts fail and we see a significant correction?" We still do not know the answers to these questions - we will have a better idea based on how we finish up this week. If we close below breakout levels on weekly charts, it would add weight to the correction argument..
Before we display charts that clearly demonstrate the current shift which is taking place from risk aversion to acceptance of risk, we would be remiss in not mentioning some concerns: (1) Capacity utilization is at extremely low levels which is disinflationary (poor pricing power for companies), and (2) while numerous markets remain above their 50 and 200-day moving averages (MA), most 200-day MAs still have a negative slope. What does the negative slope tell us? It could mean that more basing (sideways action) is needed before we can move higher. However, as stated above, we came down at a faster rate than history would have suggested, which means we could move up at a faster rate than history would suggest. As mentioned in the past, having a market trade above its 200-day MA means little if it cannot hold above the 200-day. The S&P 500 is testing its 200-day MA this week. Failure would not mean a resumption of the bear, but it would put a dent in the bullish case for the short-to-intermediate term (20 to 100 calendar days). Failure does not mean closing below the 200-day MA - it means closing below the 200-day and remaining below it for more than a few days. A break of 826, and more importantly 779, on the S&P 500 would be big wins for the bears. Any correction which holds above those levels, would look like a typical correction, and thus, keep the bulls in control. Unless the economic news starts to deteriorate again (which is possible), recent strength in numerous asset classes points to buyers stepping in at lower levels to take advantage of an opportunity to 'get back in'. However, if the buyers are spooked with worse than expected news and a violent and disorderly market decline, they may sit on their hands and let the bears regain control of the market. Our job is to pay attention with an open mind. For now the bulls remain in control and we should assume they will remain in control until we see evidence to the contrary. While the markets have shown signs of hesitation on low volume, the bears have not been able to do any meaningful damage yet. As we enter Friday's trading day the 200-day MA on the S&P 500 sits at 904 and the 50-day MA at 895. On a shorter-term basis, the bears have taken the 20-day MA which sits at 924. A close above 924 would be a small win for the bulls.
Below is an updated version of the chart we presented last week. The only change is a bullish one - crude oil's 50-day MA crossed its 200-day MA this week.

Since the U.S. Dollar and U.S. Treasury bonds represent defensive assets, a bearish trend is bullish for risk assets. A clear shift has taken place in both these charts.


Risk asset classes have also undergone a bullish transition. Remember, a bullish chart and a bullish trend do not mean that we can ignore (a) the real possibility of significant countertrend rallies, and (b) that trends cannot change. We assume we will see more of the same until we see hard evidence to the contrary. In the case of the charts below, we assume bullish outcomes, until visible bearish indications emerge. Below, we will start with a bullish chart of the S&P 500 that points out the possibility of a retest of the March 2009 lows.




