Breaking News

Yahoo nearing end of search for new CEO: repo...
11:08 PM  01/08/09

Asia stocks slip ahead of U.S. jobs
10:41 PM  01/08/09

Satyam shares fall 69.6% as Mumbai markets op...
11:30 PM  01/08/09

Moderate earthquake hits Southern California ...
11:04 PM  01/08/09

How To Market To The Modern Mom
12:30 AM  01/09/09

Second-Tier Sports In 2009
12:30 AM  01/09/09

Deal reached to end gas cut-off in Europe
10:47 PM  01/08/09

In hard times, White House replica goes up fo...
10:47 PM  01/08/09

more »

Who is an Oil Speculator?

By Jerry Slusiewicz | June 25, 2008 | 10:55 AM | 3 Comments

There are hedgers - those that are hedging a future price because they have an interest in owning the commodity today or at a future date. For example, an airline industry is extremely sensitive to the price of oil. Obviously, the brokerage firms that make trades on behalf of hedgers are just representative firms and not speculators. Everyone else that doesn't own the physical commodity today nor has zero intention of taking possession of the physical commodity in the future is a speculator. Speculators are necessary to provide liquidity. However the margin requirement to allow access is where the problem lies.

This is not much different than the speculation that led to the recent run-up in the housing market. Instead of putting the long standing traditional 20% down to buy a house - people were putting up 5% or even no money down to make a house purchase. So an out of state investor (really a speculator who had no interest in moving there) in Las Vegas condos might purchase four properties at full price instead of one. And the poor sap who was moving there for a new job (a hedger if you will, because he wanted to live there), now had to pay an even higher price as the builder was now out of inventory because they just sold off their last four properties at top dollar. So the builder raised prices and the poor sap has to pay an all time even higher price because of scarcity of the product. This worked well until the lenders suddenly realized that the game was over, the market was way overpriced and the paltry 5% down didn't cover the decline. Now the banks are in trouble for allowing speculators to run up the price that had no real skin in the game, and they are back to prequalifying investors paying ability and requiring a higher margin (i.e. down payment).

In oil, an average uneducated Joe or pension fund, whatever the case may be, for just under $10,000 can control 1000 barrels of oil today. In today's prices that's $135,000 worth of oil. They only have to put 7.5% down. Now Joe might not have that many $10,000 bills in his wallet. But Cal Pers or any of these other huge institutional speculators out there do! Therein lies the problem. The cheap access to controlling large lots of oil with no intention of ever taking possession of the commodity! They are like the Vegas condo speculator, betting on the future increase in price, using their own money and other likeminded institutions are making this a self fulfilling prophesy by bidding up the price that requires very little down payment (margin). If the margin requirement were raise to say 50%, Joe would probably be out and only the serious institutions would be playing the game under much closer scrutiny, because they would have real "skin in the game".

Speculators are necessary to create liquidity, and definitely should not be banned. But with only a 7.5% margin (down payment) and with oil up 42% year to date, that is a 400% return on investment. And we individually are paying for it at the gas pump and in higher food prices. If you're happy about that say nothing. If you're not then you want higher margin requirements to battle speculators from competing with hedgers for the oil that will soon be refined into gasoline for your car. Yes there are other factors, like the falling dollar, that also affect oil prices. But YTD the dollar is down around 5%, so that is not that significant. I wrote another piece here on Green Faucet that goes over other parameters on oil, but I wanted readers to get a better understanding of who speculators are and how they are causing oil to be way overpriced today!

Comments (3)  |  Related Topics  » | | | |

 
Interesting data regarding crude oil speculation

http://globalcapital.blogspot.com

I thought this was interesting this morning.

Deustche Bank, in partnership with Proshares, recently started some new ETNs to provide investors with leveraged positions to take both long and short positions in the crude oil markets. The symbols are DXO (Double Long Crude) and DTO (Double Short Crude). The volume for the two is very revealing. I have posted the charts with the volume data here:

http://etfchart.blogspot.com/2008/07/crude-oil-shorts-blowing-away-longs-in.html

Summarizing the data: The short volume outnumbers the long volume by 35 TIMES!

Also interesting:

Today, I learned that long traders in crude oil have much larger accounts than short traders in crude oil. They are much better capitalized! I couldn't help wondering if the longs had larger accounts BECAUSE they are long, but that's just conjecture. The point remains that the longs have more cash for whatever reason.

Tonight, the NYMEX will significantly increase the margin requirements to trade crude oil. Given than short traders have less capital, who is likely to get squeezed OUT of the market? The short traders are likely to be forced to liquidate their positions

And what is likely to be the result?

HIGHER CRUDE OIL PRICES! If the shorts are squeezed out, it will cause a short covering rally, and if the longs have more cash, they might even be ADDING to their positions.

The lesson we should learn from all this is that by trying to shut speculators out of the market, we are shooting ourselves in the foot and likely forcing crude oil prices HIGHER, not LOWER!

Submitted by sbenard on Wed, 2008/07/02 - 1:08pm » reply |
 
Erroneous assumptions lead to erroneous conclusions!

http://globalcapital.blogspot.com

Very bad idea. The pension funds and large index funds are the only people who WOULDN'T be affected by a huge increase in margins. Most are so big that they often don't use leverage anyway. They can just buy the contract. They have so much money, they don't need to use margins.

Only SMALL investors like me would be hurt in a proposal like yours! But I suppose that when you are a financial adviser who only makes money when people come to YOU instead of buying securities on their own, you don't make much money when people manage their own money, so recommending that they be banned from self trading is the best solution for YOU. You are just trying to eliminate a group of investors so that you will have them banging down your door instead. But that's not necessarily best for investors!

Margins are not set by Congress -- nor should they be. They are set by the exchanges that are independent businesses. Congress should stay OUT of businesses. Less onerous regulation is better regulation. Margins are also NOT a down payment, like in a real estate purchase. Thus, your analogy is flawed. Margins, unlike a real estate down payment, are a counter-party performance bond, NOT a down payment. Your analogy thus is scurrilous!

It is important for people to understand the futures are NOT the cash price of oil. Futures are ONLY a promise (contract) to meet an obligation at some future date. If speculators were causing higher oil prices, then the cash price would be much lower than the futures price. The cash price is very close to the futures price. Thus, the commercials who take delivery are buying and selling at nearly the same price that speculators are buying and selling.

Coincidence doesn't equal causality. The most recent data from the CFTC and the futures exchanges not only doesn't support your ASSUMPTION and OPINION (that's all this article is), they disprove it.

CFTC data suggest that speculative positions in the futures markets have been declining sharply over the past year. In fact, most of the short positions in the crude oil futures markets are SPECULATIVE in nature according to the data! COT reports indicate that the most recent sharp rises in oil prices were due to speculative shorts being driven OUT of the futures markets in short squeezes. The shorts were pushing prices DOWN, and when they were squeezed out, prices shot higher. The shorts were suppressing prices, and when forced out, prices skyrocketed. Forcing them out of the market will only cause prices to shoot higher still. We shouldn't be cursing the speculators. We should be thanking them!

Futures speculators, by their nature, MUST offset every long trade with a short one. They have to. They have no choice. It is a zero sum game. Their influence is therefore nullified on every single trade. If it were true that specs were driving prices higher, then prices would plunge in the few days before expiration due to all the specs running for the exits at once. Just the opposite happened last Friday at the July crude oil expiration. With all the specs running for the exits, prices went much HIGHER.

At any given time, CFTC and exchange data show that specs are half long and half short. They are equally balanced, and thus, have little effect on prices. Only the commercials can take a long position ALL THE TIME! And these commercials represent one thing -- DEMAND! They represent US -- we who buy and consume their product. We have met the enemy, and the enemy is US!

This article isn't meant to protect the consumer. It's meant to protect YOU!

Submitted by sbenard on Fri, 2008/06/27 - 9:03pm » reply |
 
Great analogies- Nice and

Great analogies- Nice and clear article on a very relevant top. Looking forward to your next commentary.

Submitted by LingCR on Wed, 2008/06/25 - 11:21am » reply |

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.