"It's the Economy Stupid!"

It's shocking to see so many who remain in denial about the economy, specifically the pundits. Until they see two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth (a ridiculously misleading metric - see my previous article ("How Washington is Fooling You With GDP Data") they refuse to admit we are in a recession. And the media acts as puppets, repeating these same lines without scrutinizing the data. Who do these people think they're kidding? If you're running a show designed to help investors, shouldn't you be ahead of the curve instead of behind it? Serving as broadcasters for inaccurate data that's been manipulated to fool the public does nothing to aid an audience looking for real investment guidance.

Apparently, even Washington realizes GDP data is highly inaccurate and makes revisions for up to five years. As of 2004, such revisions have already introduced question as to whether there was a recession in 2001. By 2012, we might see data that indicated we were in a recession in 2008. But that certainly won't help anyone except historians who document the Bush era, in what will be remembered as the worst recovery attempt in U.S. history.

By now, even the most financially unintelligent consumers realize we're in a recession. They feel it every time they fill up their gas tank and buy food. They've been patiently waiting for real pay increases. Instead, all they've gotten are a couple of rebate checks from Washington. What kind of charade is this? Giving consumers money you have to borrow from China, hoping they will spend it on goods (most likely from China) so you can inflate GDP data? You have to be kidding me. I would expect such an approach to fly in some third world country, but not the United States. When Washington sends you rebate checks and tells you to go out and spend it rather than pay off your credit cards, you need to interpret that as an admission that we are in a deep recession.

Even for those lucky enough to have received the standard 2 or 3% raise, they're still making much less than a few years ago due to the inflation data that continues to be fudged. As the data shows, there have been no real median wage increases for eight years. Only now does Bernanke admit inflation is a problem and states there are "significant challenges" to the economy. But, still he is understating what to me has been obvious for over two years.

So you need to ask yourself why Bernanke did not warn people ahead of time. Why did he wait for all of the blood to spill before confessing the obvious? If Bernanke wishes to play the role of broadcaster he needs to apply for a position on one of the television networks. The problem is that consumers have been fooled into thinking the Fed provides accurate guidance on the economy. Their track record speaks for itself. At best, the Fed is a broadcaster and at worst a cheerleader, much like those seen on TV. And if Bernanke wants to play the role of bailout chief he needs admit that America no longer has a real free market economy. In real free market economies, the risk of failure is present; no exceptions. If companies get in trouble they need to allow the free markets to determine their fate, not taxpayers. Otherwise, all you really have is socialism for corporations.

Always remember, you cannot have a truly strong economy when the dollar is weak. The same holds true for high commodity prices and inflation. And when you are in a war, things don't get any better, except for the GDP component due to military spending in Iraq - more debt used to boost GDP numbers. Not only has the dollar been weak for several years now, but we've also had high oil prices ever since the U.S. occupation of Iraq.

Perhaps you recall as I do the excuses made for the dotcom meltdown a few years back.  As their only way to escape admission of guilt in creating what was at that time the biggest asset bubble in history, analysts and economists finally started to proclaim "It's the economy stupid."  And yes, in fact it was the economy. It was the inherent weakness in America's consumption-based economy that expanded the Internet bubble. But it was Wall Street and the media who created the grand illusion that really pumped it up. The economy only revealed its true nature once stripped of the illusions of a bubble economy. But soon after, Greenspan re-inked the presses and started the charade again.

Today we see much of the same. America is dealing with the aftermaths of a huge credit bubble. Similar to the Internet bubble, we recently witnessed the creation of a real estate-driven credit bubble by the Fed and Wall Street, while encouraged by Washington and the media. Once again, we are beginning to see the true nature of America's real economy without the grand illusions created by overconsumption. Soon, the economy will become even weaker than after the dotcom meltdown.

Since Bush took office, America has lost millions of jobs, and investors have lost trillions of dollars as a result of the implosion of the two largest asset bubbles in history. Bush's list of records is too long to list. Foreign nations have bought trillions of dollars of critical assets at fire sale prices, from the Chrysler building to every single bit of America's once highly acclaimed underwater fiber optic network. And U.S. banks have begged Asia and the Middle East for billions. Where did they get this money? From huge trade surpluses created via spending habits of U.S. consumers. If you think this has been bad, brace yourself for much more, because this is only the beginning.

So the next time one of the "experts" make claims of a strong economy, take a look at the dollar and take a look at commodity prices. Take a look at the global wealth transfer. Take a look at your own lifestyle and see if you can manage without using your credit cards. If the dollar is low you can be assured the economy is not strong. And if commodity prices are also high, you better believe the economy is in bad shape.