Breaking News

All eyes on job losses
4:52 AM  12/05/08

Understanding but no consensus on auto bailou...
4:48 AM  12/05/08

U.S. stocks finish sharply lower; GM paces Do...
4:10 PM  12/04/08

Six gunmen shot at India's main airport in De...
3:54 PM  12/04/08

Best Middle-Class Housing Markets
5:20 AM  12/05/08

As AMD's Sales Slip, Intel Lurks
5:20 AM  12/05/08

Bankers, risk and warnings unheeded
3:45 AM  12/05/08

Pent-up anger greets return of U.S. auto chie...
3:45 AM  12/05/08

more »
 
M3

Great stuff Steve as usual. However, I would argue that when money leaves the banking system and is double counted in MMF's it should be excluded with the exeption of the portion that ends up in large time depostis. The reason being that the cash position held be MMF's is placed in large time depostis in banks and must be included in any measurment of the true money supply.

Many economist still argue that you must count MMF's because it is liquid money and can be spent readily.  I tend to agree with economists who believe that is just double counting the money supply.

Submitted by Michael Pento on Wed, 2008/05/28 - 9:17am » 

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.