Breaking News

Panel steps up criticism of Treasury over TAR...
1:03 AM  01/09/09

Yahoo nearing end of search for new CEO: repo...
11:08 PM  01/08/09

Satyam shares fall 69.6% as Mumbai markets op...
11:30 PM  01/08/09

Moderate earthquake hits Southern California ...
11:04 PM  01/08/09

How To Market To The Modern Mom
1:30 AM  01/09/09

Sony's 3-D Dreams
1:30 AM  01/09/09

In hard times, White House replica goes up fo...
11:22 PM  01/08/09

Deal reached to end gas cut-off in Europe
11:22 PM  01/08/09

more »
 
Wink-Wink

The understatement of the year. These firms as public companies have conflicted interests. The were set-up by the government, set-free, now they have been seized by the government? This sounds like the government. Am I wrong? Why were these public? I feel bad for the shareholders.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 2008/09/08 - 11:45am » 

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.