Breaking News

Asia stocks slip in long wait for U.S. jobs d...
1:45 AM  01/09/09

Panel steps up criticism of Treasury over TAR...
1:03 AM  01/09/09

Satyam shares fall 69.6% as Mumbai markets op...
11:30 PM  01/08/09

Moderate earthquake hits Southern California ...
11:04 PM  01/08/09

How To Market To The Modern Mom
1:30 AM  01/09/09

Sony's 3-D Dreams
1:30 AM  01/09/09

In hard times, White House replica goes up fo...
11:22 PM  01/08/09

Deal reached to end gas cut-off in Europe
11:22 PM  01/08/09

more »
 
I'm definitely no expert...

I'm definitely no expert (just graduated college in May woohoo!!)... but don't you think if they were going to do that they would have already? They could have bought MBS directly, but they didn't... Furthermore, even if rates were brought to zero, that still doesn't solve the problem of overwhelming debt to income ratios the consumer faces... take a look at mortgage rates, they are higher now than before the Fed started cutting. Sounds like Milton Friedman's liquidity trap. I know Ayn Rand would be pissed for not letting everything go to hell in a handbasket, but that's the world we live in. One more thing, can you explain to me what the Fed's objective is when it buys Treasury debt directly? I don't understand how that helps reflate the consumer economy. Thanks paisan!

Submitted by Bulleri on Mon, 2008/08/18 - 3:54pm » 

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.